Rapid response systems: a prospective study of response times.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the time taken for delivery of each component of care following patient deterioration and to assess the effect on response times of strategies implemented to improve the system. METHODS: A model identifying the sequence of organizational responses following a patient's unexpected clinical deterioration was developed. The time to key events and interventions from initial deterioration was measured for 3 months in 2005 and again in 2006 at a tertiary care hospital with a rapid response team (RRT) in place. Strategies to improve compliance with the RRT system were introduced between the 2 periods. RESULTS: The number of acute deterioration episodes identified increased (61 episodes in 2005; 154 episodes in 2006), but there was no improvement in response times. The 2 components contributing most frequently to delays were the time for nursing staff to call for assistance and, where needed, for physicians to call for higher-level care. Overall, 26% of episodes in 2006 and 30% in 2005 did not receive medical attention within 30 minutes of acute deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Significant delays in responding to acute deterioration persist despite strategies to facilitate the functioning of the RRT system. Simple strategies such as policy directives are not sufficient to effect change in complex health care systems.

Cancellation of operations on the day of intended surgery at a major Australian referral hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the rate of and reasons for cancellations of surgery on the scheduled day in an Australian hospital. DESIGN: Prospective survey. SETTING: Major metropolitan tertiary hospital, 13 May to 15 November 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of operations cancelled on the day of surgery, obtained each day from the operating theatre list and a separate list of additions and cancellations compiled on the day; reasons for cancellations from the cancellation list, extended or confirmed, as necessary, by questioning of bookings and ward staff, or members of the surgical team; estimated and actual duration of each operation and patient information from hospital clinical records. RESULTS: 7913 theatre sessions were scheduled by 133 surgeons in the study period; 941 of these (11.9%) were cancelled on the day, including 724 of 5472 (13.2%) elective procedures on working weekdays. Main reasons for cancellation were: no theatre time due to over-run of previous surgery (18.7%); no postoperative bed (18.1%); cancelled by patient (17.5%); and change in patient clinical status (17.1%). Procedural reasons (including patient not ready, no surgeon, list error, administrative cause, and communication failure) totalled 21.0%. Ear, nose and throat surgery experienced the most cancellations (19.6%), followed by cardiothoracic surgery (15.8%). CONCLUSIONS: There were five major reasons of similar magnitude for on-the-day surgery cancellations. We estimated that 60% of cancellations of elective procedures were potentially avoidable. Change of one factor leading to cancellation (eg, provision of more postoperative beds) is not likely to lead to improvement unless the other major factors are also tackled.

Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: the effects on tracheal intubation time and length of hospital stay.

UNLABELLED: Improvements in analgesia after major surgery may allow a more rapid recovery and shorter hospital stay. We performed a prospective randomized trial to study the effects of epidural analgesia on the length of hospital stay after coronary artery surgery. The anesthetic technique and postoperative mobilization were altered to facilitate early intensive care discharge and hospital discharge. Fifty patients received high (T1 to T4) thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) with ropivacaine 1% (4-mL bolus, 3-5 mL/h infusion), with fentanyl (100-microg bolus, 15-25 microg/h infusion) and a propofol infusion (6 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)). Another 50 patients (the General Anesthesia group) received fentanyl 15 microg/kg and propofol (5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)), followed by IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia. The TEA group had lower visual analog scores with coughing postextubation (median, 0 vs 26 mm; P < 0.0001) and were extubated earlier (median hours [interquartile range], 3.2 [2.1-4.6] vs 6.7 [3.3-13.2]; P < 0.0001). More than half of all patients were discharged home on Postoperative Day 4 (24%) or 5 (33%), but there was no difference in the length of stay between the TEA group (median [interquartile range], Day 5 [5-6]) and the General Anesthesia group (median [interquartile range], Day 5 [4-7]). There were no differences in postoperative spirometry or chest radiograph changes or in markers for postoperative myocardial ischemia or infarction. No significant TEA-related complications occurred. In summary, TEA provided better analgesia and allowed earlier tracheal extubation but did not reduce the length of hospital stay after coronary artery surgery. IMPLICATIONS: We found that epidural analgesia was more effective than IV morphine for cardiac surgery. Epidural anesthesia also allowed earlier weaning from mechanical ventilation, but it did not affect hospital discharge time.